Difference between revisions of "Talk:PC Operating System Comparison"

From BYOAC New Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(question about bullets mentioned in the Linux list)
 
(MacOS is not strictly a "PC Operating System")
Line 5: Line 5:
 
#Free (does not apply to all open source software) but "free" is already mentioned.
 
#Free (does not apply to all open source software) but "free" is already mentioned.
 
So where does exactly lie the benefit in the "open source" statement? [[User:Felsir|Felsir]] 02:39, 3 April 2006 (EDT)
 
So where does exactly lie the benefit in the "open source" statement? [[User:Felsir|Felsir]] 02:39, 3 April 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== MacOS is not strictly a "PC Operating System" ==
 +
 +
Unless we want to change this topic to "Platform Comparison" or just "Operating System Comparison", I suggest this be deleted.
 +
 +
Buddabing

Revision as of 09:58, 3 April 2006

Linux

The table says: "open source". I understand the whole open source principle, but in this table we should elaborate why this is an advantage. To me open source means either:

  1. I can customise it if I need (which leads to the disavantage to DOS that is it a complex thing to do)
  2. There is a community that keeps making it better (which leads to the disadvantage in Windows that it needs patches)
  3. Free (does not apply to all open source software) but "free" is already mentioned.

So where does exactly lie the benefit in the "open source" statement? Felsir 02:39, 3 April 2006 (EDT)

MacOS is not strictly a "PC Operating System"

Unless we want to change this topic to "Platform Comparison" or just "Operating System Comparison", I suggest this be deleted.

Buddabing