Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contents"

From BYOAC New Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Toned down the contents page)
(Toned down the contents page: added comment.)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== Toned down the contents page ==
 
== Toned down the contents page ==
  
The contents page will get more topics as the Wiki expands. The keyboard encoder section eats up a lot of space and consists largely out of productcodes. I removed those entries if people object, please discuss here first. Remember that we can put those back in at any time we wish. [[User:Felsir|Felsir]] 02:22, 8 March 2006 (EST)
+
The contents page will get more topics as the Wiki expands. The keyboard encoder section for example eats up a lot of space and consists largely out of productcodes. As the Wiki gets bigger it is impossible to list all subsections of articles on the contents page. If a section would require mention on the contents page, the section should probably have its' own article then.
 +
I removed those entries if people object, please discuss here first. Remember that we can put those back in at any time we wish. [[User:Felsir|Felsir]] 02:22, 8 March 2006 (EST)
 +
:Instead of removing I commented them out ( < ! --- tags ). Makes it easier to revert. Anyway, if we decide to keep the page like this I will remove the commented parts. [[User:Felsir|Felsir]] 02:30, 8 March 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 03:30, 8 March 2006

I think without video cards or onboard video, there wouldn't BE any video going to any of the other options. My feeling is that video cards/onboard video should come first, with the physical screen type they will be viewed on second.

I also like moving the ArcadeVGA to the video cards section

Toned down the contents page

The contents page will get more topics as the Wiki expands. The keyboard encoder section for example eats up a lot of space and consists largely out of productcodes. As the Wiki gets bigger it is impossible to list all subsections of articles on the contents page. If a section would require mention on the contents page, the section should probably have its' own article then. I removed those entries if people object, please discuss here first. Remember that we can put those back in at any time we wish. Felsir 02:22, 8 March 2006 (EST)

Instead of removing I commented them out ( < ! --- tags ). Makes it easier to revert. Anyway, if we decide to keep the page like this I will remove the commented parts. Felsir 02:30, 8 March 2006 (EST)