Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jukebox Software"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For example: | For example: | ||
| − | One description lays out resolution, others don't | + | *One description lays out resolution, others don't |
| − | One lays out orientation, others don't. | + | *One lays out orientation, others don't. |
| − | One lays out skinning, others don't. | + | *One lays out skinning, others don't. |
| − | One lays out OS it runs on, others don't. | + | *One lays out OS it runs on, others don't. |
| − | One doesn't say if it's freeware, while others do. | + | *One doesn't say if it's freeware, while others do. |
The reason I say this is because this is the exact same thing as going to each web page and fumbling through them to figure stuff out. | The reason I say this is because this is the exact same thing as going to each web page and fumbling through them to figure stuff out. | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 14 March 2006
A template should be created for this page, or at least a standardized format for laying out the features of each software.
For example:
- One description lays out resolution, others don't
- One lays out orientation, others don't.
- One lays out skinning, others don't.
- One lays out OS it runs on, others don't.
- One doesn't say if it's freeware, while others do.
The reason I say this is because this is the exact same thing as going to each web page and fumbling through them to figure stuff out.
Also, just as with the emulators, this needs to be fleshed out more fully, such as the listing in the juke forum. An example is the emulators listings. Motch laid out a fistful of them so we could go back in and know what might be out there and flesh out those (or delete them if obsolete) later, rather than piecemeal them in one by one.
Lastly, while I know these may be freeware and you guys may want to point out the presence of a donation link, in the software description does not seem to be the place to do so (to me anyway). Mention it in the overview/summary at the top. Mentioning it up there, and then including a link within the description of each looks far cleaner. Donations aren't a "feature" of the software, although I CLEARLY understand they're greatly appreciated.
Drewkaree 09:01, 14 March 2006 (EST)
