Difference between revisions of "Talk:Front-Ends"

From BYOAC New Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Don't delete discussions, it might be useful later. Rather add an archive for this.)
(Debate: "Skinnable" vs. "Skin Features")
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
This one started the discussion about using the table with is lots better then the bunch of text.
 
This one started the discussion about using the table with is lots better then the bunch of text.
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
I don't like the "Skinnable" category. I'm going to change it to "Skinning Features". The reason is that some FEs under the "Full" skinnable category really have more skinnable features than others. For example, although the game list in Kymaera can be resized, it still is always drawn as a straight up and down list of text. Plus, I don't think it can use marquee images instead of text. On the other hand, I believe Atomic can do those things, except the skins are not human readable (GRRRR!)
 +
 +
[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 09:26, 6 September 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:26, 6 September 2006


I didn't like the "Other Features" descriptions. It should use icons, because ABCDE is not rememable.

Just create logos for the "Other Features" and edit!

Please see the discussion thread Talk:Jukebox_Software about -ware in the jukebox software, why "freeware" "shareware" and "Commercial" is choosen.

This one started the discussion about using the table with is lots better then the bunch of text.


I don't like the "Skinnable" category. I'm going to change it to "Skinning Features". The reason is that some FEs under the "Full" skinnable category really have more skinnable features than others. For example, although the game list in Kymaera can be resized, it still is always drawn as a straight up and down list of text. Plus, I don't think it can use marquee images instead of text. On the other hand, I believe Atomic can do those things, except the skins are not human readable (GRRRR!)

Buddabing 09:26, 6 September 2006 (EDT)