Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emdkay"
(I don't like the 1-10) |
m (11 revisions) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 13:40, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | [[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 13:40, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I do like the "Recommended" vs. "Not Recommended" options. I may change some to "Highy Recommended". Not for emdkay, however. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I wonder if we should put a link to emdkay's off-topic ponzi scheme shenanigans? All other things being equal, that might cause some folks to choose other vendors. That would be fine with me because I disapprove of ponzi schemes, even though emdkay did a good job on my marquee. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 13:52, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I Agree. Im have changed mine to use this sheme instead. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 14:01, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I see you going to add destriptions about Vendoders. The {{Vendors}} mayben reformatted to use a simple page list, and let it link back to the main vendors page. After that, all reviews can do go below, and link back to the review. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 16:15, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Go ahead and modify the template any way you want. I'm very happy with the changes you've made with the review system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think I'm done for today. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 16:20, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | There is a "Back to Vendors" template, but if you are looking at a review, it says "Back to Reviews" instead of "Back to Vendors". Not all vendors will have reviews. Is that the change you are talking about? | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 16:23, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | It was before you made all destriptions about vendors (it was only a rating page). There was 2 links, that linked back the same page. Im may change the template, and add them back again. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Good Work Either, Buddabing | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 01:38, 27 June 2006 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 09:52, 5 December 2013
I don't like the 1-10 rating business, so I did not include one.
Buddabing 13:40, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I do like the "Recommended" vs. "Not Recommended" options. I may change some to "Highy Recommended". Not for emdkay, however.
I wonder if we should put a link to emdkay's off-topic ponzi scheme shenanigans? All other things being equal, that might cause some folks to choose other vendors. That would be fine with me because I disapprove of ponzi schemes, even though emdkay did a good job on my marquee.
Buddabing 13:52, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I Agree. Im have changed mine to use this sheme instead.
--Spacefractal 14:01, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I see you going to add destriptions about Vendoders. The Template:Vendors mayben reformatted to use a simple page list, and let it link back to the main vendors page. After that, all reviews can do go below, and link back to the review.
--Spacefractal 16:15, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
Go ahead and modify the template any way you want. I'm very happy with the changes you've made with the review system.
I think I'm done for today.
--Buddabing 16:20, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
There is a "Back to Vendors" template, but if you are looking at a review, it says "Back to Reviews" instead of "Back to Vendors". Not all vendors will have reviews. Is that the change you are talking about?
--Buddabing 16:23, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
It was before you made all destriptions about vendors (it was only a rating page). There was 2 links, that linked back the same page. Im may change the template, and add them back again.
Good Work Either, Buddabing
--Spacefractal 01:38, 27 June 2006 (EDT)